King’s College protection overstepped authority over activists during Queen’s go to – inquiry

King’s College London has apologized to student activists who have been barred from entering the college’s homes during a visit with the aid of the Queen in March after an inquiry determined that security group of workers “overstepped their authority”.
An independent file (pdf) discovered that safety personnel contacted the Metropolitan police claiming that disruption turned into in all likelihood on the occasion, and passed on the names of 13 college students and a body of workers member, in addition to choosing out pupil corporations campaigning for hire reductions and better situations for KCL’s cleaners.
The report also discovered that the university’s former head of protection had created blacklists of scholar-activists, consisting of personal information, in breach of the college’s personal facts protection recommendations and regulation.

Prof Evelyn Welch, KCL’s performing major, said in a letter to team of workers and students that she apologized “wholeheartedly” for the moves, which blocked the security passes of the targeted college students and left them unable to get entry to lectures or libraries even numerous miles from the event at the refurbished Bush House in primary London.
One pupil turned into blocked from getting into a KCL constructing for an examination at its Denmark Hill website in south London and become only able to enter whilst neighborhood team of workers allowed them in.
Prof Welch stated the report into the university’s security procedures “has been uncomfortable to read. It makes it clean that the movements we took with admire to our students have been wrong and did now not meet our values.”
KCL’s head of security – who is said to have been identified blaming the Met for barring get admission to to the rite in videos taken by means of college students – is known to now not be working at the college. Welch, in her declaration, stated KCL changed into seeking a brand new head of security.
Laura Gibbs, the writer of the review, wrote: “At some factor, a separate subculture has been allowed to broaden in a part of the estates and centers crew this is at odds with the core values of the King’s network.”
While Gibbs said she had “large sympathy” for protection staff, due to the demanding situations they faced and absence of institutional help, she concluded that “elements of the estates and centers crew have overstepped their authority”.
The investigation located that safety staff exchanged facts with contacts on the Met, naming scholar individuals of activist agencies inclusive of Action Palestine, Justice for Cleaners and Climate Strike, having identified the scholars from previous protests, in some cases the usage of video footage.
When asked with the aid of the Met’s royalty and expert protection crew for dates of delivery of the scholars, the pinnacle of safety replied in an e-mail: “I would have to visit pupil offerings and that might enhance flags and cause chatter so would alternatively not as this is touchy around student freedom!!!” [sic]
The record said that forwarding the names of KCL students to the Met without a proper request changed into a breach of records safety rules.
Welch said KCL intended to put in force the report’s suggestions in complete, to address the “systemic underlying troubles” it raised.
“While the report does not propose it, we take delivery of that a few interpreted the actions that were taken on the day as racial profiling. That became no longer the case and I want to reiterate that discrimination on any grounds is unacceptable and is adverse to our community,” Welch said.